Batshittery Redux: Sisterhood Before Safety

Ever since I wrote the post This is Batshittery, I remain appalled and aghast at the continued support the homebirth community offers to killer midwives. At the time, I received several comments along the lines of, “Don’t lump us together with those extremists!” or “They really aren’t getting THAT much support.” Unfortunately, the more I observe this horrifying phenomenon, the more I believe that it simply isn’t the case. These midwives have large numbers of supporters, including the leaders of the natural birth movement, and these advocates are putting the cause before the lives and health of women and babies.

Lisa Barrett has presided over five deaths in four years. Even if she were attending 100 births a year (which I’m sure she isn’t), this would be a shockingly high and inappropriate death rate. She revels in her maverick status and her website is full of birth stories which showcase her questionable judgment. Is she being called out by members of the homebirth community? No, but there are TWO facebook groups (Including one brilliantly named “I support Lisa Barrett and That’s Final“) with more than 1600 members showing their support and raising money for her. She was also a featured speaker at this year’s Trust Birth conference.

But there are no facebook groups raising money for her victims.

If Lisa Barrett were an isolated incident, maybe I could be convinced it’s just a few supporters showing their cultish devotion. But it isn’t. Not only did she take on a 43-year-old first-time mother (in an of itself a high-risk situation) with a breech presentation, whose baby ultimately died and preside over the death of a twin shortly after birth, Karen Carr also told a hemorrhaging mother who was being transported not to tell the hospital about the drugs she’d administered. This behavior is unconscionable for a midwife. In spite of the behavior, however, Karen Carr has more than 1500 supporters sending her money in the Legal Defense Fund for Karen Carr, CPM Facebook community and a whole bunch of people showed up to protest at her hearings.

But no one is raising money for her victims.

Sara and Jarad Snyder’s son Magnus died at the hands of midwives at the Greenhouse Birth Center in Michigan. In spite of the fact that the midwives carry no malpractice insurance, the Snyders managed to find an attorney to take their case, and they are suing. Are any homebirth advocates raising funds to assist them with their legal bills? Hardly. There are homebirth advocates, however, banding together with the midwives to raise money for their legal assistance. In fact, the leader of the natural birth movement, Ina May Gaskin herself, is lending her support to these midwives. You can’t get more mainstream (when it comes to NCBers, at least) than that. Other supporters include Barbara Harper of Waterbirth International; Peggy O’Mara, former publisher and editor of Mothering magazine and Mothering.com mogul; Jennifer Block, author of Pushed; and Geradine Simkins, president of MANA.

And the latest batshittery? At a birth center in Idaho, there were three infant deaths between October 11, 2010 and August 9, 2011. That’s THREE DEATHS IN LESS THAN A YEAR (side note: 2010 and 2011 are going to be banner years for CPMs. I can hardly wait for the CDC numbers to come out.). In one case, they neglected to clamp the cord before they cut it. In another, they took on a mother with Type 1 diabetes, a situation that many obstetricians will refer to a MFM and then neglected to transfer when the baby’s heart rate dipped dangerously low. When paramedics were eventually called, the midwife delayed them in reaching the mother. And finally, they allowed a woman to push for more than 10 hours after discovering meconium in her amniotic fluid. After these deaths, was there an outcry? Were there facebook groups created to raise money for these stricken families? No, but there was an outcry that the midwives are being investigated.

And we can’t forget Clarebeth Loprinzi, who abandoned a woman for hours with her placenta still in her uterus and who’s license was finally revoked years later after yet another infant death. Midwifery Today, the banner publication for homebirth, is hawking “educational” recordings she made with Anita Rojas, another midwife involved in Oregon infant deaths.

Then there’s Gloria LeMayAlison OsbornEvelyn MulhanAmy Medwin. Diane Goslin. Janet Fraser.

I’m sorry, but it looks like you homebirth supporters who find this bizarre phenomenon distressing are actually in the minority. The people who are supporting these mavericks are making a statement, “It is more important to make homebirth look good than to make it safe for women and babies.” But in reality, this blind devotion isn’t even serving your purpose. As homebirth becomes more mainstream and these bad midwives continue to practice, they will be hurting more and more families. More attorneys will take on civil suits.  More legislators will be appalled. More arrests will be made. Why not pull your support now and throw the bums out?

Beyonce Must Be a Terrible Mother

I personally have no idea what kind of mother Beyonce is. When I first read she was pregnant, I figured she’d be a lot like the rest of us: she would love her child deeply and want the very best for her.

Now that said infant has arrived, however, it has come to light that Beyonce is the Worst Mother In The World ™.  At least it has to many members of the Natural Child Birth Community. How did they figure this out? Well, they read in a few online tabloid articles that she gave birth via c-section. Because her baby was breech. At–somewhere around…maybe…that’s the rumor at least–37 weeks. Now, of course, breech babies are currently (unless you are a real woman, in which case you’ll give birth to your footling breech twins vaginally at home) on the official Approved Reasons for a C-section® list, but it is so very clear to these women that the timing for Beyonce is  inappropriate. We all know that articles about celebrities are the epitome of accuracy in journalism. We also know that certain members of the NCB elite have special powers enabling them to determine whether circumstances surrounding a c-section were appropriate without access to medical records (I have experienced women with these amazing powers firsthand when sharing my own birth story). And there is NO WAY that Beyonce might have released a due date later than her real one in order to throw the paparazzi off. So what does all this mean? Yep, it means that Beyonce is a selfish, horrible mother. And that the birth of her baby is sick. Gross. Ridiculous. Stupid. A real bummer. Worthy of the pronouncement, “Ugh!”

(might I interject here that I find it a little frightening that there’s a woman out there calling herself a midwife who is unaware of the difference between a gut and a uterus…)
But wait, there’s more! I had forgotten that when your baby is extracted through the sunroof, it isn’t really birth.
In reality, the baby was harvested and Beyonce would have been better off using a surrogate if she couldn’t handle a vaginal breech birth.
Yep. Oh, and beware injecting reason into any discussion regarding the issue, lest you find yourself banned!
Ah, warm memories come flooding back of the time I told my birth story in the livejournal [info]pregnant community. How quickly we forget that that mothers — even celebrities — who have c-sections are people, too.
Lest I be accused of taking things out of context, have a gander at the original threads yourself (they’re all currently open for anyone to view):

What OHLA Doesn’t Know Could Hurt You

I heard a nasty rumor for the third time yesterday: that the Legacy hospital system and Legacy Emmanual in particular have an unwritten policy of refusing to report sentinel events resulting from homebirth transfers and that they discourage their nursing and medical staff from doing so as well. Now, the first time I hear a rumor, I can ignore it. The second time it sticks in the back of my mind. And the third time? I start to think there may be something to it. Obviously I haven’t substantiated it, but when I hear something from three different people? Someone with sharper sleuthing skills than me needs to look into this.

Let’s take a step back for a minute. The history of reporting negative outcomes that end up at hospitals in Oregon has been fraught with drama. In 2010, a group of Portland midwives decided they didn’t want their bad outcomes reported and sued OHSU, a large Portland hospital, for reporting and their own licensing agency, OHLA, for investigating the reports.  Apparently these midwives are not big fans of having their inappropriate care of laboring women exposed. And apparently they don’t want to be held accountable for poor outcomes like health care workers in hospitals are.

See, hospitals are overseen by the Joint Commission, which mandates that all sentinel event outcomes (death, severe morbidity, transfusion, hemorrhage, etc.) require an investigation. Any outcome meeting certain criteria triggers intense scrutiny, evaluation, and assessment to determine if it was preventable or if standards need to be changed. The hospital system requires and ensures a thorough investigation to establish if there are systemic problems, problems with a specific practitioner, or problems with a policy or protocol that needs to be changed. ANY sentinel event results in multiple layers of meetings and discussions designed to prevent a recurrence. Not only that, in the hospital, no one works alone — there are many eyes watching each patient, which can seem intrusive, but this is part of what keeps women and babies safe and holds care providers accountable.

Where is that reflection and accountability for licensed midwives in Oregon? It simply doesn’t exist. And the only way that the Board of Direct Entry Midwifery and OHLA know of poor outcomes is if they are reported by hospitals, medical professionals, or other community members.

Back to the lawsuit.  If you google it, you can come up with all sorts of midwifery propaganda alleging that the big bad hospital is trying to put the tiny helpless midwives out of business. In reality,  the case was eventually settled with no wrongdoing found on the part of OHLA or OHSU. In any case, the argument that doctors are reporting for monetary gain is ridiculous. Homebirth accounts for a mere 1% of births overall, and HBACs and home breech births, which were the apparent basis for the lawsuit, account for even less than that. More likely, medical staff report such outcomes for the same reason any sane person would do so: they have a goal to keep  women and babies in the state of Oregon safe.

Not only that, but healthcare workers are mandated by law (Oregon HB 2059) to report “unprofessional conduct,” which means

conduct unbecoming a licensee or detrimental to thebest interests of the public, including conduct contrary to recognized standards of ethics ofthe licensee’s profession or conduct that endangers the health, safety or welfare of a patientor client.

And there are legal repercussions for not reporting! The same house bill requires that

(5) A licensee who fails to report prohibited or unprofessional conduct as required by subsection (2) of this section or the licensees conviction or arrest as required by subsection (3) of this section is subject to discipline by the board responsible for the licensee.

(6) A licensee who fails to report prohibited conduct as required by subsection (2) of this section commits a Class A violation

If this is the case, why would Legacy be declining to report such outcomes to the licensing board? One of my sources gave me a warm and fuzzy reason: if they report, midwives won’t bring potential bad outcomes to the hospital, or they’ll wait until it’s too late to do any good. If they have a policy of non-reporting, it’s actually safer for Portland families. That’s all well and good, though it doesn’t reflect well on Portland homebirth midwives.

Another person I spoke to offered a more sinister explanation. This individual thinks that Legacy is making a lot of money on NICU stays as a result of homebirth transfers, and they’d rather that other area hospitals don’t get that business. It’s true that one stay in the NICU is going to bring in a heck of a lot more money than a whole bunch of successful VBACs. Really? Maybe I’m not cynical enough, but I was shocked to hear that even floated as a scenario. I can’t imagine this could possibly be true.

There’s a third possibility as well: they’re afraid of lawsuits. These midwives have already proven themselves a litigious bunch, and even though no wrongdoing was found in the last lawsuit, I’m sure it cost a pretty penny (In a fantastic irony, legal fees were named as a reason for the need to increase midwifery licensing fees in a recent BDEM meeting. I guess that’s what happens when you sue your own board). No doubt Legacy wants no part of that hot mess.

But does fear absolve them of their duty to their patients and to the public to do the right thing? The LEGAL thing? I don’t think so.

Again, I don’t know if these allegations are true. I’m sure that Legacy has never put such a policy into writing, as it is illegal. However, I just can’t get past the fact that three different people would separately bring it up. If it is true, it is horrifying to me and something needs to change.

 

OHLA Direct Entry Midwifery Board is a JOKE (and a hazard to your health)

What is the purpose of a board of … whatever? When it comes to licensing boards, it is to protect the public by ensuring basic levels of competency. For example, the Oregon State Board of Nursing, which licenses Certified Nurse-Midwives, says

The Oregon State Board of Nursing safeguards the public’s health and well-being by providing guidance for, and regulation of, entry into the profession, nursing education and continuing safe practice.

The Oregon Medical Board, which licenses MD’s and DO’s,  also has the same mission:

The mission of the Oregon Medical Board is to protect the health, safety, and well being of Oregon citizens by regulating the practice of medicine in a manner that promotes quality care.

In addition to its licensing functions, the Board conducts investigations, imposes disciplinary action, and supports rehabilitation, education, and research to further its legislative mandate to protect the citizens of Oregon. The Oregon Medical Board is also responsible for the scope of practice of First Responders and EMTs.

What does the Oregon Board of Direct Entry Midwifery and the Oregon Health Licensing Agency do? Well, the stated mission of OHLA is

The Oregon Health Licensing Agency (OHLA) protects the health, safety and rights of Oregon consumers by ensuring only qualified applicants are authorized to practice. OHLA establishes, communicates and ensures compliance of regulatory standards for multiple health and related professions.

That, however, is far from the truth when it comes to licensed midwives in the state of Oregon. In reality, the BDEM and OHLA have…

  1.  Failed to remove the license of a midwife who abandoned a woman with a retained placenta.  Seriously? Someone who’s read one book on childbirth knows that a placenta that doesn’t come out within a couple of hours of the birth of the baby is a serious problem. And a midwife who leaves a woman in that situation? Well, that’s a serious problem as well. But apparently the Oregon Board of Direct Entry Midwifery doesn’t think so. When the Board declined to do anything about it, board member Kate Davidson, CNM, resigned in protest, saying in her resignation letter:

 After the Board’s decision not to revoke the license of a midwife who left a patient with a placenta undelivered, I do not feel I can honestly continue to serve and maintain my own personal integrity. I feel this was an egregious act and failure to revoke the license conflicts with the Board’s duty to protect the public.

  1. Progressively reduced the number of absolute risk criteria so that Oregon DEMs can attend riskier and riskier births. Between 1993 and 2009, eighteen different criteria were either loosened, reduced to non-absolute criteria, or removed from consideration altogether by the board.  Oregon midwives are now not required to even consult with a medical doctor when an infant is born at home at 35 weeks, much less transfer care.
  2. Refused to discipline midwives whose actions contributed to the death of a child. Case 05-4228 brought before the board was a complaint about a midwife’s management of fetal heart rate which led to fetal demise. According to notes from the board’s meeting on 5/19/2005, the board found that the midwife DID NOT CHECK FETAL HEART TONES APPROPRIATELY but did not discipline the midwife or make her name known to the public.
  3. Ensured that DEMs are not required to provide risk information about homebirth with malpresentations, multiple gestation, VBAC, and postdates.  The disclosures have been required by the legislature, but every time the deadline approaches to implement, OHLA pushes it back.

The Oregon Health Licensing Agency filed temporary administrative rules with the Secretary of State Office on Octoner [sic] 15, 2011, to extend the implementation date to June 1, 2012, which will require each licensed direct entry midwife provide risk information to clients, as published on the agency’s website, regarding out-of-hospital birth, malpresentation birth (breech), multiple gestations (twins), vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), and births exceeding 42 weeks gestation (post-dates.)

  1. Allowed multiple members of the board (the chair and vice-chair, in fact) to have a serious conflict of interest. Melissa Cheyney, board chair, is also the director of research for MANA, whose stated goal is “to unify and strengthen the profession of midwifery,” basically a lobbying group for midwives.  Somehow Cheyney and Susan Moray, who is MANA’s press officer (and is also employed as continuing education coordinator by the Oregon Midwifery Council, yet another lobbying organization for Oregon midwives) are allowed to maintain their positions as virtual lobbyists for midwives while running a board that is supposed to be protecting Oregon women from bad midwives.
  2. Hired a private midwife advocacy/lobby group, who has refused to release data to them in the past, to collect safety data on Oregon midwives. That’s right. Starting June 1, 2011, OHLA started requiring Oregon licensed midwives to submit data to Melissa Cheyney’s MANAstats. Totally disregarding the fact that they have requested data from MANA before, and Cheyney denied the request. According to board meeting notes from August, 2010:

Cheyney stated that OHLA requested a state account from the MANA, in order to have the ability to retrieve aggregate data for LDMs in Oregon. Cheyney stated that the MANA board’s official policy is to give state-level accounts to professional organizations as a tool to evaluate areas where more training might be needed for the purpose of self regulation, and to not provide the data to regulatory entities. Cheyney explained that MANA’s policy was generated taking into consideration that MANA is a voluntary database. Cheyney explained that MANA suspected that, due to some state regulatory boards having very hostile relationships with midwives, the quality and quantity of data submitted might be adversely affected if regulatory authorities were provided access. Due to this policy OHLA’s request for a state level account was denied. Cheyney stated that due to multiple requests made by regulatory authorities to MANA for a state-level account, the MANA board decided to re-evaluate this policy. However, based on feedback received from contributors to the MANAstats database expressing concerns, MANA determined that state-level accounts would not be provided to regulatory entities at this time.

  1. Published worthless information about licensees while obfuscating information vital to making a truly informed decision about which midwife to use for a homebirth. Want to know if the midwife you’re considering has ever been disciplined by the board? Well you’re out of luck! For example, Jennifer Gallardo has had at least two final orders (case numbers 00-01 and 02-12) that resulted from cases of fetal or infant demise. What do you find when you look up her license on the OHLA website?

 

Unresolved Disciplinary Action: None. That’s right. OHLA will only tell you if a midwife failed to pay her fine, not whether or not she’s been disciplined. What about a midwife who gave up her license rather than have it revoked? Clare Loprinzi, the midwife who abandoned the woman with the retained placenta, eventually agreed to surrender her license to the board “in lieu of revocation” in 2002 after she was involved in an infant demise in 1999. What does OHLA say about her license?

The same thing it says about midwives who failed to pay their renewal fees. And no mention of case number 99-01, including a “proposed order to revoke license due to unprofessional conduct” which resulted in fetal demise. (an aside, because I don’t have enough hours in the day to detail all that is wrong with OHLA and the OBDEM: Why the f*ck did it take THREE YEARS to take her license away?)

And what about midwives who currently have complaints against their licenses? Shouldn’t the public be aware of that? OHLA doesn’t think so. Adele Rose of Andaluz is currently under investigation for her involvement in a fetal demise in 2010 as well as another 2010 incident. Incidentally, she was given a one month suspension (during which she was allowed to continue practicing as a midwife…) as a result of case 08-5222, which was a VBAC attempt that ended in fetal demise and an emergency hysterectomy. What does a search of her license tell us?

 

Nothing. Not shocking when you consider the rest of this, but it should be.

But maybe this is par for the course when it comes to reporting actions taken against licenses?  I mean, Birth Without Fear is constantly telling us about how hospitals are hiding things from us. Maybe the Oregon Board of Nursing refuses to report actions against their licensees as well? Oh, look. If you go to the OBON website, it has all of the disciplinary actions taken in the last year, complete with details and the area in which the disciplined nurse lives. And if you look up those nursing licenses individually? Those violations are listed on the license with a .pdf of the final order. Nurses, schmurses. Surely the medical board, with those evil doctors who are hiding ALL those terrible hospital outcomes we always hear rumors (but never see any proof!) about on MDC, isn’t telling the public about actions taken against medical licensees!  Nope. They have final orders, current to those handed down LAST WEEK, on their site, complete with names and copies of the order. Not only that, but they have temporary orders taken against doctors who are being investigated listed! And violations are all listed on the medical license look-up as well.

Oregon women who are considering a homebirth should be OUTRAGED at the lack of oversight, protection, and transparency provided by OHLA and the Oregon Board of Direct Entry Midwifery. It is clear that their real agenda is to promote midwifery and not to protect Oregon families, in direct opposition to their stated goal. When are you going to start speaking out?

 

Whaaat??!? The Danger of Placenta Previa is Really Just “Hospital Drama”

You may remember the Whaaatt? post regarding birthing at home with placenta previa. If you need to refresh your memory, it’s right over here. As it turns out, the original page is the gift that keeps on giving. Birth Without BS posted a link for discussion on her facebook page, and many people were appropriately shocked at the poorhideously awful advice therein.  However, one commentor took it upon herself to educate the masses:

Ahhh, I see, that makes so much sense. If we could all just have a slightly more Traditional — with a capitol “T”! –indigenous paradigm (which has apparently been proven, as opposed to the “unproven male mechanistic medical paradigm”), things like placenta previa just wouldn’t be a problem! We can just keep calm and that placenta will take care of itself. Our reptilian brain will kick into gear and somehow get that baby THROUGH the placenta and out first. Not only that, if you manage to acquire that Traditional, indigenous paradigm, you WILL be able to just read something off the internet and go for it. Change your paradigm, people!!

 

 

WHHAAATT? Formula is a Fate Worse than DEATH?

Yes, that’s right. If that baby needs anything more than skin-to-skin contact and breastmilk, then you should apparently just let him die. I don’t know what’s more disturbing: that someone actually typed this out or that NINE  TWENTY ONE other people said, “Hey! I like that!”

(original post)

Only slightly less disturbing: the woman who thinks it might be reasonable to risk giving a special needs baby pertussis in order to donate breastmilk to him…

This is Batshittery.

Sorry, but there is no other word that accurately describes what is going on here. “Crazy,” or even “insane” don’t even begin to characterize this phenomenon. What is it?

That homebirth advocates continue to support Lisa Barrett. And every other dangerous midwife out there.

Who is Lisa Barrett? She is an Australian midwife who is currently the subject of a coroner’s inquest. On her website she recounts — with pride — birth stories full of high risk scenarios and obviously questionable judgement, ranging from… twins whom she allowed to deliver more than 48 hours apart (Story comes complete with a google search whereupon she came back to inform the expectant parents that the average time between delivery of twins is FORTY SEVEN DAYS. Even though most reputable sources and common sense report it as being 17 minutes.)… to a 35 weeker who didn’t begin breathing until TEN MINUTES after she was born… to a HBA3C with a previous vertical incision. Pictures of limp, blue babies abound.

On her site, she also claims 20 years of experience “within the system” and :

I am experienced in all types of birth and this includes birthing at home with babies in a breech position, twins and birth after caesarean. Anyone who believes they want and need this service should be entitled to get it.

So what does all this experience include and why is she facing a coroner’s inquest? It’s not because THE MAN is after her. It’s not because, as she claims in her plea for money at the top of her page, “the authorities are trying to censure homebirth via its most vocal advocates.”  It’s not “another witch hunt of a sister midwife.”

No, it is because this is a woman has attended at least four birth-related deaths since 2007. These are spectacularly horrific numbers, and who knows if they’re even complete. As much as homebirth advocates love to parrot the phrase, it just isn’t true that “babies die in the hospital, too.” Yes, they die of anencephaly or heart defects, but it is unbelievably RARE for babies who were perfectly healthy before labor started to come out dead or dying. But somehow, in Lisa’s case, they do. The first two deaths were HBACs and the last two were twin births.

  • Tate Spencer-Koch, born in July of 2007,  suffered a shoulder dystocia for more than 20 minutes and was unresponsive by the time she was finally delivered. The ambulance officers testified in court that Lisa hindered their attempts to get the baby into the ambulance and to the hospital.
  • In April 2009, Jahli Jean Hobbs was breech, became stuck, and was eventually born when Gemma Noone, A DOULA who was not supposed to have a role in the delivery at all, freed her arm, enabling her head to be delivered, but she was not responsive. It was all too late for little Jahli Jean.
  • In July 2011, Lisa attended the homebirth and death of an unnamed twin in Western Australia, which — in an amazing coincidence –also happens to be where Annie Bourgault lives.
  • On October 9, 2011, Lisa crammed with the mother and lifeless twin into the front seat of a car (Do they not have emergency transport in Australia? Or, perhaps, was it that she does not want ambulance officers testifying at the next inquest…) when complications arose after the home delivery of a first twin; the second twin was later declared dead at the hospital.
After the death of Spencer-Koch, Lisa attempted to argue  in the Australian High Court that the infant was never, in fact, a live  human being, and thus not deserving of a coronial inquest. The court disagreed and the inquest began. Throughout the hearings, Lisa continued to trumpet her contempt for the system and her victims by tweeting from the courtroom, including the chillingly ironic:
Yep. October 6.  Three days before the fourth death. Looks like “normal service” resumed all too quickly. Actually, Lisa has been for the past several months attending births outside of the law. Earlier this year, she handed in her registration because she no longer wanted to work as a midwife, giving the excuse that she was not happy with moves last year to increase regulation of midwives. However, since relinquishing her registration, she has attended more than twenty births, including the last two deaths. She claims she is only acting as a consultant and advocate, but she is still advertising her midwifery services on the Maternity Coalition website, on the Bellybelly breech birth page for practitioners “who are skilled and experienced with vaginal breech birth” (apparently having a doula deliver a mostly-dead baby counts as experience), on the Essential Baby midwives page, and on Birth Matters.

Yet, in spite of her blatant recklessness and disregard for human life, the homebirth and midwifery community continues to support Lisa Barrett.  We have the 1400 strong  “I Support Lisa Barrett and That’s Final” facebook page, complete with the idiotic slogan “Freedom is in Peril. Defend it with all your Might.” These women are depositing money into her bank account. She also hosted a movie fundraiser night, where 60 people bought tickets at $25 each, and additional people made donations, in an effort to support her legal battle.

This phenomenon is not unique to Lisa Barrett, either. Karen Carr is a midwife who said after the death of a breech infant under her care, “The baby’s position wasn’t the problem, the problem was that the baby’s head became stuck.” She is also a midwife who practiced illegally in both the states of Virginia and Maryland, and who was prosecuted after two deaths and a case of severe brain damage, all within a years time. She recklessly accepted the care of a 43-year-old first time mom with breech positioning and tragedy resulted. But does the homebirth community condemn her recklessness? NO! She is hailed as a hero and the community is raising money for her “defence.” I don’t see anyone raising money for her victims, though.

What about Amy Medwin? Amy presided over the death of an infant in North Carolina, where CPMs are illegal. She is blatantly flouting the judges’ orders and continues to attend births, posting about them on her open facebook page. She too has bunches of acolytes supporting her and paying her legal bills.

And then there’s the great-grandmother of them all, self-taught Gloria LeMay. According to the College of Midwives of British Columbia, LeMay has had myriads of complaints against her, including several deaths; has been given a permanent injunction against practicing midwifery; has even GONE TO PRISON; but continues to flout the law and attend births. Has she been censored by the homebirth community? Of course not! In fact, she is teaching online midwifery courses which have enthusiastic reviews all over the (Oh, look! It’s Lisa Barrett endorsing Gloria LeMay!) internet.

WAKE UP, PEOPLE! If you truly wanted homebirth to be safe,  you’d be outraged at the outrageous behavior some of these so-called midwives exhibit. It’s not a matter of a woman’s “personal choice.” Any woman can have her baby at home with whomever she wants to attend. It’s a matter of who gets to give themselves the authority that comes with the title of midwife and use that title to profit.  And sorry, no matter how much you may protest to the contrary, calling yourself a midwife does indeed impart some semblance of authority. Do those of you who practice safe midwifery really want to be lumped in the same group with these mavericks who take risks with other peoples’ lives? I sure wouldn’t. Any other profession would be banding together to throw the bums out rather than circling the wagons around them. Is this an indication of the real values behind the culture of homebirth? That the advancement of lay midwifery is more important than the safety of women and babies? It is MIND BOGGLING to me that not only is no one speaking out against this egregious behavior, and in fact, they’re all throwing their support behind it.

Off topic WHAT??!?: Proof that Birth-related Issues Do Not Have the Corner on the Sanctimommy Market!

ETA: In a spectacular twist of irony, it turns out that Mom 1 below is Brenda Scarpino-Newport, whose negligence and anti-hospital rhetoric contributed to the death of Mary Beth Chapman.

 

Happened across this little gem on a blog called “Mothers With Cancer.” Allow me to translate:

Mom 1: “I have cancer and I’m commenting on a site called mothers with cancer. I’m hoping to find some solace with other mothers experiencing the same thing. Here I will tell a bit of my story and say something thoughtful and a little little inspiring. I have an amazing attitude and am listening to my doctors and continuing the treatment they and I have decided is best, even in the face of a poor prognosis.”

Mom 2: “You idiot! How could you possibly be listening to your doctors? You know they’re just in it to make money off of you until you die! Which you are no doubt going to do. And soon, if you keep listening to them. Probably within weeks. Too bad you aren’t as insanely awesome as me, who went to doctors but totally ignored what they had to say, and who is curing herself with diet and exercise. You know that makes me superior!! And I’m cancer free!! Not that it actually had anything to do with my self-prescribed treatment, but na, na, na boo boo, you dumb a$$! Oh, wait. Better throw in a little pseudo-inspiring BS lest I look like a complete jerk.”

 

 

 

 

WHAT?? You would still VBAC with 99% chance of uterine rupture?

 

Oh, and before I get all the comments about how I’m shoving all NCBers in the same box…she may be the only one who would VBAC unassisted with a 99% chance of uterine rupture, but she sure isn’t the only one who thinks scientific evidence is bunk.

The good folk at Unhindered Living

Birth Without Fear

 Jette Clausen

 

All over the forums at MDC